Research Groups

The School of Critical Studies at CalArts launched the Center for Discursive Inquiry in September 2017. The Center aims to enable the development of particular areas of research that emerge from Critical Studies faculty and which require exploration in discursive settings.


At the Conjuncture: Art and the Imagination

The imagination has a long and complex trajectory as a human faculty, but in this epoch of planetary-scale computation and the explosion of synthetic intelligence, genomic engineering, and robotics it has been decentered and accelerated in compelling and disconcerting ways. Now more than ever the security of positivistic reasoning has undergone radical questioning, addressing with urgency the fundamental perceptions of what we are, and what our reality consists of, yet opening as well almost unthinkable and unimaginable possibilities for our definition of what human modes of thinking and the imagination could be. However, the tension between the possibilities that the imagination holds and its material reality remain intolerably constrained and controlled by the structures of planetary capital. The question of global sapience, as potential and as problem, consists of dense strands of transparency and opacity. In this project, the focus will be on proposals for reconfigurations of time, space, and otherness that necessarily generate comprehensive interrogation of the formation of histories, and at the same juncture think time as informing possible alternate, non-linear futures.

This current research module explores and models the dynamics of the imagination as a manifestation of artistic production and critical thought, in part ‘as if’, in part as concept/object modeling, to effectuate other modalities which might lead to different modes of world-making. This ‘global’ (as opposed to individualistic) reenergized faculty of imagination—imagination on a global scale—asks us to focus on the relations between the empirical, the socio-political, the economic and the scientific space of what is common, and potential philosophical concepts of universality. It asks us to consider the condition of the subject in the world, the world that forms a subject, and the transgressive production of the global imagination through it, as well as the divisive violence that is incumbent upon the planetary impulse itself. 

The global in this case brings us back to the question of metaphysical meditations and socio-political ruptures, and vice versa; it demands that we address the traversals between what mind is and what is a world; what is an act of self-consciousness about it, and the acts of unconscious doings when both are acts in the world. The complexity and contradictions of the representations of transcendence and embodiment are not simply political or philosophical, but they can instantiate new perspectives on the role of the global artistic imagination.

Conveners

Amanda Beech
James Wiltgen
Christine Wertheim


Since 2017, the Center for Discursive Inquiry has focused on issues of how to think and generate possible new worlds, and how to conceive and begin implementing the processes of their actual construction. We are resolutely committed to futures that can realize new, more sustainable, just, and inclusionary forms; and encounters with what we deem a malleable past, with the goal of continual revision and reconfiguration. 

Recognizing that today the formal languages of science and mathematics hold sway over vast swaths of knowledge production, the latest iteration of our project focuses on language, exploring the variety of ways communities and disciplines utilize natural, artistic, and formal languages in theoretical and practical constructions in popular culture, politics, science and philosophy.

We look at how natural and aesthetic/artistic languages continuously rework the past in sociological terms, as well as at how they participate in the scientific imaginary and the production of facticity and belief. Simultaneously we explore how scientific languages themselves need these others if science is to ‘grip’ the space of the political. Integral to this is to respond to the mobilization for and consequences of oppositions to languages that rationalize, order, manage and control society, highlighted in post-structural critiques of the last century that advanced critiques of capital. By focusing on texts, artworks, and other media that pose questions about the dynamics of how human beings ought to live, as well as how they attempt to explicate the conditions of our own understanding of ourselves and the world, we examine how these different language-types construct, and interact with each other. This includes how less formalized discourses can succinctly gain traction on reality. In doing so, this research tests the claim that it is only by combining different categories of language that we can instantiate a dynamic model capable of producing an enhanced engagement with the real.  

In this iteration, questions of representation and referentiality, positivism and negativity will be foregrounded and leveraged here as a means to address the challenges posed by the contemporary moment that continue to brace us between radical disorientation and ideation of the future. Underpinning this problem of the political, the question of what to think and what to do, is a renewed problem of metaphysics, the junctures and disjunctures of thought and image, of knowing and doing, of concept and representation, as well as the problem of the identities of the disciplines of the arts and sciences themselves.

Conveners

Amanda Beech
James Wiltgen
Christine Wertheim


Language and its Possible Worlds is a research group stemming from the work of a previous research group hosted by the Center for Discursive Inquiry, Cold War Cold World (2015-2017) that produced the publication Cold War Cold World (Urbanomic, 2017). A second volume, Construction Site for Possible Worlds, was published in 2020, also by Urbanomic.

Its focus is an in-depth navigation of ontology and epistemology at the intersection of the relationships between the conditions of knowing, and environments for constructing. A tradition of critique has overdetermined projects of knowledge to ‘end of the world’ scenarios, borne as much from recognitions of the banality of difference and the lugubrious ennui of neo-liberal capital. Instead, we charge ourselves with questions of the future, what is not merely speculative in antirealist hypotheticals, but which are deemed as possible; worlds that are moored. The Constructivist Working Group is the first phase in this investigation of building. We ask how thought, model and form can be practiced across scientific, logic based, mathematical and ordinary languages; how the “ordinary language” that is culture, can do more than mirror the paradigms of negativity and finitude that often spring from cultures of critique and skepticism, and move to propose forms of life, work and construction that re-engage questions of foundations, borders and territories – the scope of a world.

The focus in 2020 is an in-depth navigation of ontology and epistemology at the intersection of the relationships between the conditions of knowing, and environments for construction and re-construction. We ask how thought, model and form can be practiced across both scientific, logic-based mathematical languages as well as quotidian languages; and further, how the “ordinary language” that is culture can do more than mirror the paradigms of negativity and finitude that often spring from cultures of critique and skepticism, and move to propose forms of life, work and construction that re-engage questions of foundations, borders and territories – the scope of a world. Succinctly, how can we address with reflective urgency the relevant questions of the future?

Conveners

Amanda Beech
James Wiltgen
Christine Wertheim


Events

Spring 2019

  • Thursday, March 14 – Reading Seminar on Modality, Normativity Intentionality by Robert Brandom,  2001. 

    The session will be lead by Daniel Sacilotto, who will introduce the essay and begin our
    discussion. This meeting is in part designed to further our investigation of language & possible worlds, and as a prelude to both Brandom's new book A Spirit of Trust. You can find the text at the following link: http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/courses/rules/papers/Brandom.pdf

    Daniel Sacilotto is a philosopher and an instructor in the CULB Comparative Literature program. His research focuses on the reconciliation of rationalism with materialism, and the pursuit of revisionary naturalism in the work of Wilfrid Sellars, Alain Badiou, Lorenz Puntel, Jay Rosenberg, and Ray Brassier. He is currently preparing a monograph in which he develops a functionalist theory of cognition and realist theory of knowledge, chiefly inspired by the works of Wilfrid Sellars. His essays include: Puncturing the Circle of Correlation (2017); A Thought Disincarnate: What Does it Mean to Think? (2018); & Realism and Representation: On the Ontological Turn (2012).

Fall 2018

  • Thursday, Sept. 17 – Reading Seminar on Allography & the Strange Agency of the Objectile by Matthew Poole, with Jeremy Lecomte as respondent.
  • Thursday, October 18 – Reading Seminar on The History of Philosophy as a Philosophical Problem by Martial Gueroult.

    The session will be lead by Anna Longo, who will introduce the essay and begin our
    discussion. 
  • Thursday, Nov. 8 – Panel discussion on Language and Possible Worlds, featuring Daniel Sacilotto, Inigo Wilkins, Amanda Beech and Anna Longo. 

Cold War Cold World (CWCW) is the research group focusing on the term “Cold World,” which many see as descriptive of our current situation. 

In this world of infinite complexity, algorithmic capital, and the technological sublime, we ask, can images and narratives construct agents who might decipher the mutable continuum and cascading contingencies we see today? And, more, how can this Cold World with all its apparent instabilities, this site of “lawlessness” and alienation, be central to the enhancement of human rationality?

 

While the Cold War embedded, expressed and performed the dread of an epoch heralded by the confrontation with perplexing yet rampant forces of nihilism and extinction, today these have morphed and congealed into new forms of terror and fear, producing a ‘Cold World’ driven by a nascent full spectrum dominance under the aegis of ‘Algorithmic Capitalism.’ Potentially adrift in the massive explosion of digital images and algorithmic data-forms generated across multiple platforms, we encounter a strange type of machinic joussiance in a variant of Marxian hyper-commodification, produced by the iterative looping of a control society bent on modulations of tracking, prediction, and the diffusion of dividuals

The CWCW Research Group argues instead for an alternative view in which Cold War aesthetics is loosened from its anthropomorphic moorings, providing navigational protocols for assessing these machinic formations as generators of new languages and other forms of communication that do not require a correlate between the unknown and human disappearance. The project both critiques what we identify as the Cold World paradigm—in terms of temporal formation, art, and political economy—and interrogates the moving image and narrative configurations as primary modalities of expression and experiment in epistemological, ontological and teleological formations in the contemporary moment. 

Cold War Cold World established in 2015 involves workshops, seminars and public discussion that combine philosophical, critical and artistic inquiry.

Objectives

  1. Critique what we identify as the Cold World paradigm, where the contemporary—as temporal formation, as art and as political economy—will be subjected to dense articulations of critique.
  2. Generate new rules by and for “a-subjective agency.” The abstract and the concrete form a key architecture of analysis, with the stricture that there exists no antecedent reality that serves as the basis of critique.
  3. Develop a theoretical model that comprehends consciousness, change and reason and the place of the understanding in a re-orientation of thought at the level of public consumption and mass experience.
  4. Interrogate the moving image as a primary modality of expressions and experiments in epistemological, ontological and teleological formations today and for the future.

Directors 

Amanda Beech
James Wiltgen

Members and affiliates

Christine Wertheim
Matias Viegener
Brian Evenson
Eyvind Kang
Adam Berg
Reza Negarastani
Patricia Reed
Joshua Johnson
Keith Tilford

Information

Cold War cinema embedded, expressed and performed the dread of an epoch, the confrontation with perplexing yet rampant forces of nihilism and extinction. Inside these frames, images, narratives and objects mirror the faces of incomprehensible and ubiquitous enemy forces placing the role of culture as an idealized space of kitsch titillation, folkloric explanation/explication, spectacle and collective psychosis. Marking in multiple ways the naming/advent of the Anthropocene Era, those forces have morphed and congealed into new forms of terror and fear, producing a ‘Cold World’ driven by a nascent full spectrum dominance under the aegis of ‘Algorithmic Capitalism.’ Potentially adrift in the massive explosion of digital images generated across multiple platforms, algorithmic data-forms, made by and for machines and beyond human vision we encounter a strange type of machinic joussiance in a variant of Marxian hyper-commodification, produced by the iterative looping of a control society bent on modulations of tracking, prediction and the diffusion of dividuals.

Whilst this abstraction of Cold World visuality could be seen to instigate a new form of the technological sublime, and reawaken narratives of the crisis of human life and its intelligence, it also urges thought to loosen itself from the anthropomorphic moorings of Cold War aesthetics, so as to encounter the machines that humans have produced as generators of other languages and other communications that do not require the correlate between the unknown and human demise. Parallel to these shifts, ‘alien’ experiences, narratives of ‘other’ forms, and topographies and excursions into unknown possibilities often seek to trouble, reject and surpass the condition of the human as we know it ahuman decenterings calling forth modes of ‘rational inhumanism.’

This project makes the claim that the clash between the manifest and the scientific image, and between art, science and philosophy must be taken up in order to navigate and remap the conditions of the image/sign coordinates, and in particular the image as a diagram of power dynamics. Fundamentally, we ask if a new mode of naming is tenable for this required cognition of visuality, conception and experience, taking critical account of the legacy, necessity and traction of aesthetics, semantics and normativity.

Events

  • Feb. 5, 2016 – Reza Negarastani: Rationality, Computation, and the Clash of Images
  • April 15, 2016 – Benjamin Bratton. Workshop: Reading The Stack
  • Nov. 14, 2016 – Panel discussion Neoliberalism, Neo-Con, Neo-Noir: The Cold World and Fiction. James Wiltgen, Chair, Speakers, Amanda Beech, Robin Mackay, Reza Negarastani.

This series explores Afro-Arab Futurisms in contemporary art and cultural production. 

In the past decade artists have responded to ongoing wars and continued corporate/imperial practices in the Middle-East and North Africa with alternative visions of the future. We have seen national conceptions of Palestine as a single high-rise tended to by a woman in a space-suite in the work of Larissa Sansour for instance, and artists working under the heading of “Gulf Futurism” in response to fast growing urban spaces in the Persian/Arab Gulf region. In light of these practices, this research group attempts to contextualize Speculative Arab Futurism in relation to longer traditions of futurist resistance in Afrofuturism.

Convener

Sara Mameni

Events

Held at Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions

  • October 13, 2018 – Ronak Kapadia

Kapadia is assistant professor of gender and women’s studies and affiliated faculty in Global Asian Studies and Museum and Exhibition Studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He is author of the forthcoming Insurgent Aesthetics: Security and the Queer Life of the Forever War (Duke UP, 2019), which examines the visionary, world-making potential of contemporary art and aesthetics in the context of ongoing US war and empire in the Greater Middle East. 

  • November 3, 2018 – Roundtable Discussion: Letters to the Future: Black Women/Radical Writing 

Featuring Harmony Holiday, Harryette Mullen, Tisa Bryant and Zakiyyah Iman Jackson.

With “art as a form of epistemology” and “disaster as the convention of the present state” as conceptual frameworks, poets Erica Hunt and Dawn Lundy Martin’s groundbreaking 2018 anthology, Letters to the Future, gathers and explores the innovations and interventions of contemporary Black women writers as they manifest the future of Black life, aesthetics and concern. 

More Information

  • November 17, 2018 – Nasrin Himada

Himada is a Palestinian writer, editor and curator based in Tio'tia:ke (Montréal), in Kanien'kehá:ka territory. Their writing on contemporary art has appeared in Canadian Art, C Magazine, Critical Signals, The Funambulist, Fuse Magazine, and MICE Magazine among others. They are the co-editors of contemptorary.org.

More Information